Color Scheme

June Slater: It's clear Starmer has no interest…

It's clear Starmer has no interest in the people of this country. He even told us he prefers Davos to Westminster 'because you can get things done.' But what does that mean, well it means he doesn't have to get legislation passed the voting public or Westminster .he can just do it. If you think you're going to get anything different from Andy Burnham, think again. He's already beaten Starmer to the WEF door. Recognised at an early age as an ideal poster boy for globalisation, all he needs is an opportunity back to real power. Mayoral isn't big enough for Andy, his whole working life has been funded by the tax payer. If he makes it to number 10 Britain will be funding global ideas with tax payers' money. This isn't about Makerfield for Andy it's about being a hot shot on the world stage . I keep reminding you the communists have won, they're in number 10 . We're fighting to get the ground back. Makerfield is as significant as The Battle of Bosworth Field in 1485 where political history was changed forever. It's a two horse race as Robert Kenyon, Reform, beat all other parties in the General Election and strained 31% of the vote he came second to Labour . Don't let this happen again. Embrace your national significance or die on the field or intensified socialism.

Andrew Bridgen: Wikipedia says…

Wikipedia says: Regarding Japan’s take up of the Covid 19 ‘vaccines’. Does this explain the record drop in population ? Japan approved the Pfizer–BioNTech, Moderna, Oxford–AstraZeneca, Janssen, Novavax, and Daiichi Sankyo vaccines for use. In April 2024, data from the government stated that 80.4% of people have acquired at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, 79.5% had their second dose, while 67.1% had at least three shots.

Robin Monotti: Climategate 2.0…

Climategate 2.0: New E-Mails Rock The Global Warming Debate "Three themes are emerging from the newly released emails: (1) prominent scientists central to the global warming debate are taking measures to conceal rather than disseminate underlying data and discussions; (2) these scientists view global warming as a political “cause” rather than a balanced scientific inquiry and (3) many of these scientists frankly admit to each other that much of the science is weak and dependent on deliberate manipulation of facts and data. Regarding scientific transparency, a defining characteristic of science is the open sharing of scientific data, theories and procedures so that independent parties, and especially skeptics of a particular theory or hypothesis, can replicate and validate asserted experiments or observations. Emails between Climategate scientists, however, show a concerted effort to hide rather than disseminate underlying evidence and procedures. “I’ve been told that IPCC is above national FOI [Freedom of Information] Acts. One way to cover yourself and all those working in AR5 would be to delete all emails at the end of the process,”writes Phil Jones, a scientist working with the United Nations Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), in a newly released email. “Any work we have done in the past is done on the back of the research grants we get – and has to be well hidden,” Jones writes in another newly released email. “I’ve discussed this with the main funder (U.S. Dept of Energy) in the past and they are happy about not releasing the original station data.” The original Climategate emails contained similar evidence of destroying information and data that the public would naturally assume would be available according to freedom of information principles. “Mike, can you delete any emails you may have had with Keith [Briffa] re AR4 [UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 4th Assessment]?” Jones wrote to Penn State University scientist Michael Mann in an email released in Climategate 1.0. “Keith will do likewise. … We will be getting Caspar [Ammann] to do likewise. I see that CA [the Climate Audit Web site] claim they discovered the 1945 problem in the Nature paper!!” The new emails also reveal the scientists’ attempts to politicize the debate and advance predetermined outcomes. “The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guid[e] what’s included and what is left out” of IPCC reports, writes Jonathan Overpeck, coordinating lead author for the IPCC’s most recent climate assessment." (2011)

David Icke: Kanye West allowed to perform in the Netherlands…

Kanye West allowed to perform in the Netherlands by Bart Van den Brink, Minister for Asylum and Migration - 'no valid reason to deny him entry' - while I have been banned from the country and thus some 30 others in the Schengen border group for nearly 4 years for agreeing to speak at a PEACE rally in Amsterdam in 2022 when the message was we must put aside our differences and unite on the threat to ALL our freedoms. Go figure. Apparently, we must unite across the religious, political, racial, and cultural divide to defend freedom is more dangerous than 'Heil Hitler'. They took the tried and trusted 'antisemitism' approach with me and when they couldn't make that stand up in court they changed their 'justification' to 'he's a threat to democracy'. The irony is stunning.

Ben Judah: How is this chart hiding Brexit...

How is this chart hiding Brexit damage? The first trick here is indexing everyone at 100 in 2016 at the moment of the shock to the 🇬🇧. The second is to measure the flow not the stock of accumulated investments. That lets you hide the fact 🇬🇧 stock is permanently smaller behind a graph just showing the flow of new investments is increasing. In layman’s terms: let’s imagine you were getting 5% a year salary increases in the years leading up to 2016 above those of your peers. The shock in 2016 then reduces that to a similar level to them or below. What a chart of investment flows indexing everyone in 2016 at 100 does is just show you afterwards creeping up in line with the rest of them — it hides the years of accumulated funds you would have had without Brexit. Clever! That’s how you hide 🇬🇧 business investment is 12-18% below where comparator economies predict it should be — per CEPR’s December 2025 synthetic control analysis of 33 advanced economies. Or the fact, quoted below, 🇬🇧 business investment was down 16.2% on the eve of the pandemic on the OBR’s own pre-referendum expectation. No control group required for that.

Liz Webster: The Times Starmer’s govt is...

🚨 The Times: Starmer’s govt is politicising the justice system Former DPP Sir Max Hill warning that the handling of Palestine Action cases risks breaking public trust in the judiciary. 🔥 Uneven approach: heavy crackdowns on left/pro-Palestine activism while appearing softer on right-wing extremism. 🔥 Rise in “perverse verdicts” as juries act on conscience against perceived unfair prosecutions. 🔥 Proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist group seen as overly broad and politically driven. This is seriously dangerous territory. When governments selectively weaponise terrorism laws and override jury independence to pursue political goals, they erode the independence and legitimacy of the justice system. @KarlTurnerMP @labourlewis @mainstreamlbr

Robin Monotti: Therefore, the reason for higher...

Therefore, the reason for higher energy bills boils down to subsidies to energy giants which are paid via governments taxing your energy bills with the false label of a "green tax", and rerouting that money they extract from you to the energy giants themselves. Essentially you are paying more to fund the energy giants infrastructure for control of non hydrocarbon energy over small producers and the excuse is the false notion that somehow non hydrocarbon energy is better than hydrocarbons, when it is not because hydrocarbons do not cause warming, the Sun does.

Andy Burnham’s Victory Offers Little Hope of Real Change for Britain

Andy Burnham’s Victory Offers Little Hope of Real Change for Britain The outcome of the by-election in Makerfield, where Greater Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham is expected to stand, has sparked heated debate across British social media. Many commentators have reached the same conclusion: even if Burnham succeeds in replacing Prime Minister Keir Starmer, very little is likely to change for the country.

Pouria Zeraati: Important/ Contrary to the reports of...

Important/ Contrary to the reports of "Axios" and "Associated Press" which claim that Tehran has agreed to the terms of the temporary agreement and is awaiting Trump's decision, Israeli sources say that within the regime, despite the agreement between Araghchi and Wittkoff on the terms of the deal, Mojtaba has still not given final approval. Just minutes ago, for the the IRGC has issued "warning shots" toward four vessels in the Strait of Hormuz. At the same time, regime media reported that the sound of an explosion was heard in Hormozgan.
Read more